Jason Meesseman
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chesterfield, MI
188 matches · 91W–97L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history188 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2025
1PEACH- White 75 COMBO MEN F2
1PEACH-GAINES 70MIX 18&O SEM F2
1PEACH-GAINES 8.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F2
3PEACH-SCHAEFER 40M TH 40&O SEM F2
1PEACH-SCHAEFER AD40&O TH 40 MEN SEM F2
2PEACH-WHITE 75MEN SEM F1
3PEACH-GAINES 7.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F2
4PEACH-GAINES 8.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F2
4PEACH-ITCHON 18&O TU 40 MEN SEM F1
4PEACH-MAZUR 18&O MIX 8.0 SEM F4
6PEACH-GAINES 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM F2
1PEACH-ITCHON AD18&O 40M TU SEM F3
1PEACH-MAZUR MIX18&O 80 SEM F3
2PEACH-GAINES MIX18&O 70 SEM F4
2PEACH-GAINES Mixed 40&O 7.0 SEM F3
3PEACH-MEESSEMAN AD40&O 40M TH SEM F2
4PEACH-GAINES Mixed 40&O 8.0 SEM F2
3PEACH-GAINES 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F2
4PEACH-GAINES 8.0 mix 40&O SEM f2
4PEACH-SELLERS 75 MEN COMBO SEM F2
5PEACH-GAINES 7.0 mix 40&O SEM f2
5PEACH-MEESSEMAN 40M 40&O AD THURS SEM F2
6PEACH-GAINES 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F4
1PEACH-GAINES 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F4
2PEACH-HOMBREBUENO 75 MEN SEM F1
3PEACH-GAINES 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F5
3PEACH-HOCH 7.0 40&O Mixed SEM F1
3PEACH-LATTIE 85M COMBO SEM F1
4PEACH-GAINES 8.0 40&O Mixed SEM F2
4PEACH-MEESSEMAN 40M 40&O AD THURS SEM F2
5PEACH-TIPTON 45M 18&O AD WED SEM F2
6PEACH-SELLERS 40M 18&O AD TUES SEM F3
7PEACH-HOMBREBUENO M tri-level 35 40 45 SEM
2LIFE-PARISI 40&OVER 70MIX F4
2PEACH-GAINES 40&OVER 80MIX F1
3PEACH-GAINES 80mix 18 sem F2
4PEACH-GAINES 70mix 18 sem F2
6PEACH-HOMBREBUENO 75 MEN COMBO SEM F1
drop july 17 PEACH-MEESSEMAN 40m 40 thur sem F1
drop july 24 no lg PEACH-SELLERS 40m 8 tues sem F2
1PEACH-DEGUZMAN 8.0 mix 18&O sem f1
2PEACH-GAINES 80 mix 40&O sem f1
2PEACH-MEESSEMAN 40MEN 40 THUR SEM F1
4PEACH-DORSEY 7.0 mix 18&O sem f2
4PEACH-DORSEY 70 mix 40&O sem f1
4PEACH-SELLERS 40MEN 18 TUES SEM F2
6PEACH-HOMBREBUENO 75 combo men SEM F1
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
51.7%
31W–29L · 51.7% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.6% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
9W–18L · 45.9% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.