← Search

Debbie Carey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Germantown, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
236 matches · 161W–75L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020 and 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history236 matches
W
2026-11-03 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Theofiledes
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-10-29 · Martin/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Scifert
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-10-22 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Missy Gulick
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-15 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Theofiledes
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-13 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-01 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Scifert
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-17 · Martin/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carolyn Santos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-15 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carolyn Monistere
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Crews championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Missy Gulick championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Crews championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-08 · Martin/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carolyn Santos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 72.1% of games
3.0
91.7%
22W–2L · 66% of games
3.5
83%
44W–9L · 65% of games
4.0
57.7%
45W–33L · 51.9% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
11W–0L · 69.3% of games
7.5
46.3%
19W–22L · 52.4% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 69.1% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
38 matches
#2 Singles
15%
36 matches
#1 Singles
14%
32 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova