← Search

Jon Caico

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Southampton, NY
3.5T year-end 2024
i
Tournament Exclusive — rating from tournament play only
55 matches · 25W–30L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history55 matches
W
2024-05-19 · Quogue, Caico · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Barry mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2024-04-21 · Quogue, Caico · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Pawlowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-02-11 · Quogue, Caico · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Byrnes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-12-10 · Quogue, Caico · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joelle Kronberg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-11-12 · Quogue, Caico · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Barry mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-10-15 · Quogue, Caico · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meredith Little mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-03 · Westhampton, Caico · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Barry mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2023-05-07 · Kings Park, Pomerantz/Kolomick · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna LoCascio mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-03-12 · Kings Park, Pomerantz/Kolomick · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Kolomick mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-03-04 · Westhampton, Caico · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Blenk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
W
2023-02-26 · Quogue, Caico · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kris Adams mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
W
2023-02-19 · Quogue, Caico · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Barry mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.1% of games
7.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 52.4% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
34.5%
10W–19L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer