← Search

Brianne Larsen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
WINTER GARDEN, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 54W–29L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history83 matches
W
2026-10-23 · Lake Cane-Kender/Maser/Hemphill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcia Rosman
loading the estimate
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-09 · Lake Cane-Kender/Maser/Hemphill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Freeland
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-02 · Lake Cane-Kender/Maser/Hemphill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcia Rosman
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-24 · Lake Cane-Wu · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Christelle Smith
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-08 · Lake Cane-Maser/Kender · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Barton
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-03 · Lake Cane-Wu · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christelle Smith
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · Lake Cane-Kender/Maser/Hemphill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hela Ghariani
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-15 · Lake Cane-Kender/Maser/Hemphill · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcia Rosman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-13 · Lake Cane-Kender/Maser/Hemphill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mardy Goote
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-07 · Lake Cane-Kender/Maser/Hemphill · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mardy Goote
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · Lake Cane-Kender/Maser/Hemphill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Maser
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-17 · Lake Cane-Kender/Maser/Hemphill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hela Ghariani
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 58.8% of games
3.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 69.7% of games
3.5
72.7%
32W–12L · 60.5% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.7% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 64.4% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 38% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 24% of the time
#1 Singles
24%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
19 matches
#2 Singles
19%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova