← Search

Leigh Cladakis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 98W–118L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history216 matches
L
2026-11-02 · LCTA18/Curry/Parkwest · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karin Crookes
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-30 · LCTA54/Newman-Miller/Park West · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Lerner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-29 · LCTA40/Ait-Lasko · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammi Spruill
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-28 · LCTA64/Portman/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Veneman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-22 · LCTA40/Ait-Lasko · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Kuehmeier
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-21 · LCTA64/Portman/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Hamrick
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-19 · LCTA18/Curry/Parkwest · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karin Crookes
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-16 · LCTA54/Newman-Miller/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karin Crookes
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-14 · LCTA64/Portman/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Hamrick
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-10-07 · LCTA64/Portman/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Cheeseman
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-01 · LCTA40/Ait-Lasko · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammi Spruill
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-30 · LCTA64/Portman/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Veneman
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
53.6%
15W–13L · 51.6% of games
3.0
44.6%
62W–77L · 47.3% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
46.4%
13W–15L · 48.5% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 36.8% of games
3.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.8% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams