Search

Lisa Foisy

Alameda, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
101 matches · 64W–37L · seasons 20192025
Where Lisa sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Lisa is one of 1349 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 32% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lisa has gone from the 29th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
12W–4L · 60.8% of games
3.0
51.9%
27W–25L · 52% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
W
Prakash Nagpal / Megan Grunatmixed
2025-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Manish Singh
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
April Cruz / Sharon Lebenkoff
2025-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sam Page
+0.018better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
N/A
2025-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kay Kolos McCubbin
+0.063better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Elizabeth Soutter
2025-05-04 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.004below expectation — took 14% of games against 25% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Jill Foley / Michelle Marshank
2025-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Dayton
0.029below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Rice
0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathrine Wright
+0.051better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Stephanie True / Kimberlee Baker
2024-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Enns-Ford
0.035below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Bokgi Choi / Becca Tessin
2024-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Davis
+0.006about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 4-4
W
2024-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Enns-Ford
+0.005about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Sonia Unbehend / Jennifer Rogers
2024-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Olson
0.006about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Rhonda Bethurum / Teresa Engrav
2024-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Enns-Ford
+0.017better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.