← Search

MaryBeth Giles

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 78W–43L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history121 matches
W
2026-11-01 · OSB: We hit that!: Griffin/Riordan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Katz
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-10-17 · OSB: Diamond Dogs: Trausch/Degrooth · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Edwards
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-02 · OSB: 7.0 Mixed Searle: Searle/Duggan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Noniewicz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Katz championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Katz championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · OSB: Diamond Dogs II: Libert · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Katz
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-6
L
2026-05-15 · OSRC:Katz/Giles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Noniewicz mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · OSB: Diamond Dogs II: Libert · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Duggan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-22 · OSB: Diamond Dogs II: Libert · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Katz
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · OSB: Diamond Dogs II: Libert · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Bates
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-13 · OSRC:Katz/Giles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthias Podzuhn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-31 · OSRC:Diamond Dogs:Trausch/Degrooth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Katz
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
90.5%
19W–2L · 67.5% of games
3.5
63%
29W–17L · 53.9% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 60% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
16W–20L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#1 Singles
21%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova