← Search

Kata Pagon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Novelty, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 45W–53L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history98 matches
L
2026-10-11 · C 6.5W CRC2 Guepfer · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Misencik
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-13 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Svetlana Pomeranets
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W TCC Lane · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Leombruno
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · A40 3.5W CRC Garten · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Guepfer
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-06 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Svetlana Pomeranets
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · A18 3.5W TCC Lane · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Bidwell
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Svetlana Pomeranets
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W TCC Lane · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Shine
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · A40 3.5W CRC Garten · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Corbets
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Corbets
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · A18 3.0W CRC1 Falberg · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neeti Wyckoff
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-28 · A18 3.0W CRC1 Falberg · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Tramer
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
10W–0L · 68.2% of games
3.0
43.5%
20W–26L · 48% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 40.4% of games
5.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.1% of games
6.0
50%
5W–5L · 50.2% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 39% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova