← Search

Kami Yaegers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sarasota, FL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 12W–20L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history32 matches
L
2026-10-21 · Laurel Oak Golden Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Sparma
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-24 · Laurel Oak Golden Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jacqueline VonKuhn
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-11-02 · Laurel Oak Double Shots · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Stroble
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-19 · Laurel Oak Double Shots · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Penny Durham
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2024-05-23 · SARASOTA/Krotky/40&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leanne McWilliams
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-04-18 · SARASOTA/Krotky/40&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Johnson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-04-11 · SARASOTA/Krotky/40&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alicia Cohler
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2024-02-17 · Laurel Oak Krotky · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Schoenfeld
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-02-10 · Laurel Oak Krotky · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Powell
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-11-15 · Laurel Oak DocSlice Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Stroble
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-10-18 · Laurel Oak DocSlice Girls · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Courtney Rosenthal
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-10-04 · Laurel Oak DocSlice Girls · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Yudi Carpenter
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 44.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 34% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
7 matches
#1 Singles
19%
6 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
1 match
#3 Female Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal