← Search

Gia Sawko

STAMFORD, CT
0.0 year-end
117 matches · 46W–71L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Gia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Gia is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gia has been a steady 2.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.02.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Gia has gone from the 12th to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
49%
25W–26L · 47.6% of games
3.0
35.8%
19W–34L · 44.7% of games
5.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history117 matches
L
2021-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Schoener
−0.028below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2021-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Dana Kuykendall
+0.008below expectation — took 0% of games against 14% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Kelly Maxwell / Natasha Kattauchamps
2021-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Chikhani
+0.005about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2021-06-17 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Chikhani
−0.001below expectation — took 8% of games against 23% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Carrie Maddux / Sandra Shearerchamps
2021-06-16 · #1 Doubles · with Deborah Yamane
−0.018below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Ashly Ryan / Rachael Boylechamps
2021-06-15 · #2 Doubles · with Judith Milligan
−0.057below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Gretchen Mersch / Joeanna Parkerchamps
2021-06-14 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Chikhani
−0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Katharine Clemmer / Monica Taylor
2021-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nicole Chikhani
+0.029better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Miriam Pasimio / Anna Clark
2021-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lexi Johnson
+0.011about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2021-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Chikhani
+0.011about as expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Marilyn Barajas / Jessica Berger
2021-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Kerestesi
−0.053below expectation — took 48% of games against 69% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Alisia Pulella / Kelly Knight
2021-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nicole Chikhani
−0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.