← Search

Benjamin Katz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
DURHAM, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 135W–75L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history210 matches
L
2026-10-14 · TOC.Byrd2 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Piasecki
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-06 · TOC.Byrd · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frederick Holding
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-04 · JByrd.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ranjith Dasaradhi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-30 · TOC.Byrd · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frederick Holding
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-29 · JByrd.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Casey Collins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-27 · TOC.Byrd · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Monty Gaither
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · JByrd.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bharath Dheekonda
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · TOC.Byrd · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frederick Holding
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-09 · TOC.Byrd2 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ryan Lewis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · JByrd2-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Piasecki
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · JByrd2-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Meske
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · JByrd2-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vamsee Pasangulapati
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 56.3% of games
3.0
50%
5W–5L · 54.8% of games
3.5
72.8%
75W–28L · 59.8% of games
4.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 54.4% of games
6.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 61.8% of games
7.5
61.5%
24W–15L · 58.5% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
54 matches
#2 Singles
9%
19 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova