← Search

Laura Schmitt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 70W–135L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history205 matches
W
2026-10-18 · Hradsky/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jodee Gore-Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-13 · Dallison-Drake/Fayetteville/KTC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Yaping Zhu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-06 · Dallison-Drake/Fayetteville/KTC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Yaping Zhu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-24 · OGTA: OGTAgonals 3.0 Fall · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Lufkin
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Hradsky/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janis Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Lightle/Bentonville/HRA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Lightle
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · Lightle/Bentonville/HRA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherry Fitzgerald
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Lightle/Bentonville/HRA · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Iva Shanahan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · Lightle/Bentonville/HRA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Lightle
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-2
L
2026-05-05 · Bianconi/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Stroup
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Snell/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clara Park
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Bianconi/Rogers/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittani Hradsky
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 47.6% of games
2.75
42.9%
9W–12L · 44.7% of games
3.0
37.8%
34W–56L · 44.7% of games
3.25
0%
0W–4L · 39.3% of games
3.5
0%
0W–7L · 21.3% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
40%
12W–18L · 46.8% of games
6.5
11.8%
2W–15L · 28.3% of games
2.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
48 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe