← Search

Lisa Lohre

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Francisco, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 152W–71L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history223 matches
L
2026-10-10 · OLYMPIC CW9.5A · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Caitlin Beatty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-01 · OLYMPIC CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Catherine Fogelman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-09-28 · OLYMPIC CW9.5A · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Alisa Yee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-15 · OLYMPIC CW8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Catherine Fogelman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-07 · OLYMPIC CW9.5A · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Nicole Mitchell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Beatty
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Beatty
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-06 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Beatty
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-04 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Beatty
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Beatty
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Beatty
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-13 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Beatty
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
100%
10W–0L · 75.3% of games
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 76.6% of games
4.0
73.5%
36W–13L · 62% of games
4.5
32.3%
10W–21L · 44.1% of games
6.5
100%
12W–0L · 74.9% of games
7.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 67.6% of games
8.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 54.2% of games
9.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.6% of games
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 66.9% of games
8.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 65.3% of games
9.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
49 matches
Singles
9%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer