← Search

Debbie Corman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
RICHMOND, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 96W–115L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history211 matches
W
2026-10-27 · Willow Fork - Alley Cats · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Cahill
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-20 · Willow Fork - Alley Cats · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcie Naughton
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-13 · Willow Fork - Firecrackers · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Bromlow
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-12 · Willow Fork - Crushers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Scott
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-06 · Willow Fork - Firecrackers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Georgina Allende
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-25 · Willow Fork - Crushers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Kuzawa
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-22 · Willow Fork - Alley Cats · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Cahill
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-15 · Willow Fork - Firecrackers · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jolena Tu
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · Willow Fork - Win or Booze · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christi Hamilton championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casandra Kourradi championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · Willow Fork - Tennis-e-wiskeys · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Russell
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-12 · Willow Fork - Tennis-e-wiskeys · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amelia Reddington
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.2% of games
3.5
44.1%
64W–81L · 48.7% of games
4.0
42.3%
11W–15L · 44% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.1% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
44 matches
#4 Doubles
16%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova