← Search

Dana Platt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Meridian, ID
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 17W–38L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history55 matches
W
N/A
2025-08-21 · Smashed Taters · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ginger Cummins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-08-14 · Smashed Taters · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vicki Goss mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-10 · NDS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Kubosumi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-08 · NDS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ralph Rico
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-24 · NDS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Leblanc
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-17 · NDS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Leblanc
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-06-10 · NDS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bernie Weldon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-07-18 · Met Your Net · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Saknit
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-17 · Met Your Net · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Hawkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-12 · Met Your Net · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Hawkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2023-07-10 · Met Your Net · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stanley French
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
L
2023-06-21 · Met Your Net · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Cowles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.9% of games
3.5
20%
3W–12L · 38.9% of games
7.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 31.4% of games
5.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#1 Singles
22%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
9 matches
Singles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
11%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe