← Search

Ruxandra Sandoval

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fresno, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 72W–55L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history127 matches
L
2026-10-10 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Seng Leang Tang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-30 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alyssa Marie R Chern
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-09-02 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alyssa Marie R Chern
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-29 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Petula Veatch
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-08 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Vor championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clare Marie Castillo championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raquel Medina championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Roberts championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.5A · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lethy Palomera
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-31 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Vor
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Lee
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.1% of games
4.0
54.3%
19W–16L · 51.7% of games
4.5
75%
9W–3L · 56.9% of games
7.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.5% of games
8.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 46.8% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
34 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams