← Search

Susan Schraeder

San Diego, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 65W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Schraeder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dinah Mattozzi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Garrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Back
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elayne Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · SD 6.0 Peninsula TC/ Hagstrom · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marva Gesell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Edge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · SD 6.0 Peninsula TC/ Hagstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marva Gesell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · WC SD 7.0 Peninsula TC/ Randquist · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daren Hillebrandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marva Gesell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · SD 7.0 Vintage/ Randquist · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susie Alvarez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
Natalie Anderson / Stephanie Erickson
2026-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marva Gesell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 50% of games
3.5
26.3%
20W–56L · 41.9% of games
6.0
90%
9W–1L · 66.3% of games
7.0
44.2%
19W–24L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
31.8%
7W–15L · 45.5% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
41 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King