Search

Wes Williams

Olympia, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
115 matches · 47W–68L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
97%
stay 3.0
3%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.0
30 of 41
WA · 3.0
512 of 755

Wes is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Wes has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Wes has gone from the 78th to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.8% of games
3.0
40.5%
15W–22L · 45% of games
6.0
44%
22W–28L · 46.3% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history115 matches
L
Ned Kiley / John Rapp
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Phillips
0.028below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Ned Kiley / Peter Prekeges
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Ramirez
+0.027better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Oscar Grados / Bryson Huie
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Gentzler
0.016below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Bryson Huie / Michael Osthus
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with George Ramirez
0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
Devon Newsom / Joseph Rehberger
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Gentzler
+0.018better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Steve Racine / Nicholas Kelly
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with George Ramirez
0.047below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Ramirez
+0.056better than expected — took 100% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Lockett
0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Troy Kelley / Mark Hassig
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Gentzler
+0.071better than expected — took 62% of games against 34% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · with Steven Lockett
0.037below expectation — took 35% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Timothy Snow / MARK MILLERchamps
2025-09-12 · #1 Doubles · with Daniel Salinas
0.042below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Joseph Bella / Robert Johnston
2025-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Ramirez
+0.013better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.