← Search

Xiaojuan Li

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Beachwood, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 31W–34L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history65 matches
L
2026-11-01 · CX 6.5 MV2 Wu · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with George Raguz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-24 · CX 6.5 MV2 Wu · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Xiaofeng Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-11 · CX 6.5 MV2 Wu · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with George Raguz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-27 · CX 6.5 MV2 Wu · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Xiaofeng Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W MV1 Kanetsky · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
Default
2026-07-02 · A18 3.5W MV1 Kanetsky · #1 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W MV1 Kanetsky · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · A18 3.5W MV1 Kanetsky · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · A18 3.5W MV1 Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Therese Cunningham
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-22 · A18 3.5W MV1 Anderson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire D'Angelo
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-08 · A18 3.5W MV1 Anderson · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-22 · X18 7.0 MV1 Gustafson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Gustafson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
83.3%
15W–3L · 66.7% of games
3.5
20%
4W–16L · 38.3% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 58% of games
6.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 48% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.7% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer