← Search

Erlinda Gomez

Weston, FL
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 100W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erlinda Gomez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history197 matches
L
2026-08-18 · DavidPark/Capella · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bianca Capella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-3
L
2026-08-08 · DavidPark/Capella · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lidia Luz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-30 · DavidPark/Capella · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Andrade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · C/Piccolo/Perilla · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adrian Perez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-01 · C/Piccolo/Perilla · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Federico Rossi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-06 · Piccolo/Risquez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roberto Nieves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-05 · Piccolo/Risquez · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adrian Perez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-26 · Wrc/Ream · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Land
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-10 · Wrc/Ream · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Solano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-03 · Wrc/Ream · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valeria Cisneros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-02 · Piccolo/Risquez · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jorge Nieto Castellanos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-26 · Wrc/Ream · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Solano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–4L · 34.3% of games
3.5
71.1%
27W–11L · 58.1% of games
4.0
32.7%
17W–35L · 44% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.8% of games
7.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 53.7% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.8% of games
8.0mixed
45.7%
16W–19L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
57 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams