← Search

Nadine Ono

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pasadena, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 52W–80L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history132 matches
L
2026-10-25 · SGV Spinners-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emma Greenlee
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-24 · SGV Spinners-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Gerbode
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-14 · SGV Fired up Flint-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/W12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lilit Khatchaturian
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-09 · SGV Fired up Flint-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/W12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Markowski
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-27 · SGV Spinners-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emma Greenlee
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-22 · SGV Fired up Flint-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/W12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Gerbode
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-06 · SGV LLW Flinters-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SU12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adrienne Beauvois championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · SGV Flint Tri-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SU4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Becker
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · SGV Flint Tri-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SU4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Bang
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · SGV Fired up Flint-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/W12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Alberts
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · SGV Fired up Flint-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/W12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Sudo
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · SGV Fired up Flint-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/W12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Alberts
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
28.1%
9W–23L · 44.4% of games
3.5
39.2%
20W–31L · 44.7% of games
7.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.1% of games
0.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 42.7% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer