← Search

Andrea Tarud

Weston, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 155W–74L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Andrea Tarud to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Midtown/DeLaMora · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ili Montnor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · WestonHills/Garbine · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anabella Este
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-30 · Midtown/DeLaMora · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paulina Riveros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · Midtown/DeLaMora · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marta Pena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · WestonHills/Garbine · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alejandra Cofino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · Midtown/Ibarra · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Antonio Macias Valdes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-13 · WestonHills/Garbine · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alejandra Cofino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Midtown/DeLaMora · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marta Pena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · Midtown/Montserrat · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fany Villarroel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · MUVeltri/Contreras · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paulette Janice Snagg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · Midtown/Nader · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anabella Este
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-04 · MUVeltri/Morim · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 58.7% of games
3.5
68.8%
86W–39L · 57.8% of games
4.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 50.3% of games
6.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.3% of games
7.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
78.3%
18W–5L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
64 matches
#1 Singles
22%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
44 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova