← Search

Ami Young

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 93W–50L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history143 matches
W
2026-09-28 · EMillard-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elyssa Millard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-27 · EMillard-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emma Gould
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-20 · EMillard-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elyssa Millard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · KMasood-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emma Gould
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-13 · KMasood-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Beall
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-23 · KMasood-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Naramor
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-09 · KMasood-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Beall
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-29 · ROakley-EV · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-08 · ROakley-EV · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-11 · ROakley-EV · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
N/A
2025-06-10 · ROakley-EV · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reggie Oakley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-03 · ROakley-EV · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reggie Oakley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
81.8%
27W–6L · 60.9% of games
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 62.5% of games
3.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 44.8% of games
5.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 63.9% of games
6.5
68%
17W–8L · 57.4% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 64.3% of games
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.5% of games
6.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
32 matches
#1 Singles
8%
12 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#3 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams