← Search

Belinda Baldwin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 37W–28L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history65 matches
W
2026-10-11 · Team 9 Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Edwards
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · Team 9 Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Kimbell
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-09-27 · Team 9 Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Kimbell
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-13 · Team 9 Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Niki Leete
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lacy Bain
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Niki Leete
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lacy Bain
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Charles
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-02 · Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Bowden
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-20 · Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Charles
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-12 · Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Fagan
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-10 · Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.5F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Bowden
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 58.7% of games
3.5
54%
27W–23L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer