← Search

Jill Silver

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Medfield, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 14W–12L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history26 matches
L
2026-07-14 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfield Women:Barker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Davis
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfield Women:Barker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Isaf
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfield Women:Barker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Isaf
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfield Women:Barker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Isaf
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-26 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfield Women:Barker · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Witman
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-08 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfied:Barker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Williamson
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-06-17 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfied:Barker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rui Huang
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-06-10 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfied:Barker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Witman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-05-27 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfied:Barker · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Abstoss
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-05-13 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfied:Barker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Dawley
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-23 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfied:Barker · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amelia Slawsby
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-06-25 · KIGM:Kingsbury Medfied:Barker · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Dawley
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.9% of games
3.5
45%
9W–11L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#2 Singles
15%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#1 Singles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova