← Search

Leigh Ann Doerger

— year-end
17 matches · 3W–14L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Leigh Ann Doerger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2021-04-16 · Queen City White · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2021-03-26 · Queen City White · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Benning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2021-03-19 · Queen City White · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Benning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2021-03-05 · Queen City White · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2021-02-26 · Queen City White · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Shaw-White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-2
L
2021-02-12 · Queen City White · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Hubert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2021-01-29 · Queen City White · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2021-01-22 · Queen City White · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2020-12-04 · Queen City White · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Shaw-White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2020-11-20 · Queen City White · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 3-1
L
2020-11-06 · Queen City White · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2020-10-30 · Queen City White · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Langhammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams2 teams · 2021–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
17.6%
3W–14L · 34.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer