← Search

Cory Efird

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 124W–97L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history221 matches
W
2026-03-25 · Moore 4.0 Spring 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriel Adam Moore
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-3
L
2026-03-24 · Moore 4.0 Spring 2026 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-19 · Moore 4.0 Spring 2026 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-10 · Moore 4.0 Spring 2026 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-04 · Moore 4.0 Spring 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barrett Wright
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
Default
2026-03-02 · Moore 4.0 Spring 2026 · #2 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-25 · Moore 4.0 Spring 2026 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · Moore 4.0 Spring 2026 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-16 · Moore 4.0 Spring 2026 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-15 · Moore 4.0 18 Mixed W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lensey Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-01-17 · Moore 4.0 18 Mixed W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Efird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-10 · Moore 4.0 18 Mixed W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Efird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
80%
12W–3L · 63.1% of games
3.5
65.8%
25W–13L · 54.3% of games
4.0
38.6%
22W–35L · 46% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
72%
18W–7L · 59.8% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 60.3% of games
7.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 45.1% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.7% of games
4.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.8% of games
6.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 70.9% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
14W–4L · 61.1% of games
8.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
42 matches
#1 Singles
13%
28 matches
#2 Singles
9%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer