← Search

Victoria Ness

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Reno, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
290 matches · 176W–114L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history290 matches
L
2026-11-01 · CAUGHLIN CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Knapp Nolan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David AuCoin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-18 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David AuCoin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-17 · CAUGHLIN CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lesley Pittman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-03 · CAUGHLIN CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Watson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-27 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 55MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wally Murray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 55MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wally Murray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-09-05 · CAUGHLIN CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lesley Pittman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-29 · CAUGHLIN CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Knapp Nolan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 40MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denis Diehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-09 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 40MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denis Diehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · CAUGHLIN 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marci Banes championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
72.3%
47W–18L · 58.9% of games
4.0
44%
22W–28L · 47.2% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 35.5% of games
7.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 60.6% of games
7.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 45.9% of games
8.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 52% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
24W–4L · 61.1% of games
8.0mixed
61%
47W–30L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
82 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer