← Search

Jim Byrne

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Blue Point, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 82W–74L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history156 matches
W
2026-07-13 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Curry
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-08 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MIKE VOYACK
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian McKeown
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darrell Ingold
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-18 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Curry
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Curry
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-08-14 · Blue Point, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with MIKE VOYACK
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-30 · Blue Point, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian McKeown
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-23 · Blue Point, Subject/Selvaggio · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Selvaggio
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-21 · Blue Point, Subject/Selvaggio · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian McKeown
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-16 · Blue Point, Subject/Selvaggio · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Singer
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
Adam Gold / Raymond Lombardi
2025-07-14 · Blue Point, Subject · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian McKeown
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
91.7%
22W–2L · 68.1% of games
3.5
66%
33W–17L · 58.4% of games
4.0
41.9%
13W–18L · 43% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
31.2%
10W–22L · 44.3% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 39.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams