Lori DeLisser
168 matches · 94W–74L · seasons 2021–2026
Captains: add Lori DeLisser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history168 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
Sandra Torres / Elizabeth Wakefield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Lori Martin / Yolanda Zuverza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Darren James / Lori Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
Amy Goldfarb / Cindy Blackman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams26 teams · 2024–2026
GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Tan/EPTC#4
GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Tan/EPTC#7
GEPTA/18&overMX/4.0/Brown/EPTC#4
GEPTA/40&over/4.0W/Tan/EPTC#4
GEPTA/40&overMX/4.0/Woo/EPTC#1
GEPTA/55&over/7.0MX/Roacho/EPTC
GEPTA/55&over/7.0W/Ricks/EPTC#2
GEPTA/55&over/8.0MX/Maese/EPTC#2
GEPTA/55&over/8.0W/Tan/EPTC#3
GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Davis#3
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
67.4%
29W–14L · 55.6% of games
4.0
19%
4W–17L · 39.1% of games
4.5
80%
8W–2L · 57.2% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 63.5% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 29.2% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 64.6% of games
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 55.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.