← Search

Beth Lynch

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pittsburgh, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 72W–66L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history138 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Mr n Miss Hits · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Newell Washburn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-24 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Diulus championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-23 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Pallaki championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-23 · Glen Creek · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-10 · Mr n Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Lynch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-03 · Glenview-Villages/ Eng · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Josselyn
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-09-27 · Glen Creek Level Up · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Langston
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-20 · Glen Creek Level Up · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Irwin
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-13 · Glen Creek Level Up · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Irwin
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Pallaki championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · Glen Creek · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-22 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Pallaki championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 43.2% of games
3.5
80%
32W–8L · 60.7% of games
4.0
46.4%
13W–15L · 49.4% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.5% of games
8.0mixed
54.2%
13W–11L · 48.8% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 27.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
48 matches
#1 Singles
29%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
22 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
11 matches
Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer