← Search

Kristin Berry

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
266 matches · 222W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history266 matches
W
2026-11-02 · Rivers/Ronk · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joyce Kim
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-28 · LCTA18/Leahy/I'On · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Callie Condie
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-10-26 · Rivers/Ronk · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joyce Kim
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-10-16 · LCTA18/Leahy/I'On · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Ronk
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-15 · Rivers/Ronk · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joyce Kim
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-10-14 · LCTA18/Leahy/I'On · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcie Hanish
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-30 · LCTA18/Leahy/I'On · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Callie Condie
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-28 · Rivers/Ronk · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Kirsling
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-21 · Rivers/Ronk · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joyce Kim
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · LCTA18/Sass/Creekside · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cooper Collier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · LCTA18/Sass/Creekside · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Sass
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Craft championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
94.1%
16W–1L · 71.1% of games
3.0
88.2%
45W–6L · 66.7% of games
3.5
91.1%
51W–5L · 68.8% of games
4.0
75.8%
47W–15L · 60.7% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 41% of games
5.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 70.6% of games
6.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 63.7% of games
7.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 65.9% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 63.6% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
64 matches
#2 Singles
5%
13 matches
#3 Singles
4%
10 matches
#1 Singles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams