Search

Christy Granard

Entiat, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
139 matches · 65W–74L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
18%
stay 3.0
82%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 63% stay · 37% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.97. Lower than today’s 3.07 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
137 of 755

Christy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams32 teams · 2019–2027
3.0 KIW2 Shot Divas W55F
2027 Fall Adult 55 & Over · 3.0 Adult 55&O Women Sat
2027
PHX/Hanson/55&O/6.0W
2026 Spr Adult 55 & O · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over Women Sat
2026
Fall 6.0 KIW Shot Divas W55F
2026 Fall Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over Women Sat
2026
PFC - Steiner
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 WOMEN
2025
PHX /Champagne/55&O/6.0W
2025 Spr Adult 55 & O · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over Women Sat
2025
Holding
2025 Spr Mixed 55 & O · Holding
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Christy has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020192022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Christy has gone from the 55th to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 51% of games
6.0
53.3%
32W–28L · 50.9% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 35.3% of games
6.0mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history139 matches
W
Deborah Lazar-Kline / Debra White
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Candis Brink
+0.101better than expected — took 75% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Nicole Barney / Debra Champagne
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Eckenrode
0.022below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Suzanne James / Elisa Bell
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Candis Brink
0.011about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
ROBIN SKAGGS / Beth Jensen
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janette Hanson
0.013about as expected — took 68% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Holly Brauer / Debra White
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandee Andrews
+0.099better than expected — took 75% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Nancy Taylor / Darci Norberg
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandee Andrews
+0.052better than expected — took 86% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Tina Dunning / Rachel Speliopoulos
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandee Andrews
+0.019better than expected — took 62% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Holly Brauer / Kathy Joy
2025-12-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandee Andrews
+0.022better than expected — took 62% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Carolyn Kelly / Aimee Hombach
2025-11-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Candis Brink
0.011about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Connie Mountan / Darci Norberg
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandee Andrews
+0.006better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Andrew Teng / Christine Ryuchamps
2025-11-08 · PFC - Steiner · #3 Doubles · with Ward McQueen
0.095below expectation — took 0% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Roldan Sanabria / Jane Erbechamps
2025-11-07 · PFC - Steiner · #3 Doubles · with Ward McQueen
0.028below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.