← Search

Tanya Robinson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pasadena, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
259 matches · 148W–111L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history259 matches
L
2026-10-25 · OC Costa Mesa - Dee - Sun9 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Noriko Imai
loading the estimate
6-7
W
2026-10-25 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arcadia-SA11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine M Liu
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-18 · OC Costa Mesa - Dee - Sun9 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Goff
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · OC Costa Mesa - Dee - Sun9 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Goff
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arcadia-SA11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Quynh Nghiem
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-19 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sandra Zane
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-06-19 · Supreme Courters/Heum/Balboa · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-07 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carmen Martinez
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-31 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arroyo High-SA10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine M Liu
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-31 · SGV Spring Gummies-Manley-Arroyo HS/ SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kiyomi Fisher
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-16 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arroyo High-SA10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiyomi Fisher
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-4
L
2026-05-16 · SGV Spring Gummies-Manley-Arroyo HS/ SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kiyomi Fisher
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 44.4% of games
3.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 61.4% of games
3.5
59.2%
58W–40L · 53.5% of games
4.0
36.6%
15W–26L · 42.5% of games
7.0
86.4%
19W–3L · 61.9% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.9% of games
2.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.9% of games
7.0mixed
60%
21W–14L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
56 matches
#1 Singles
18%
47 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe