← Search

Vincent Sica

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Littleton, CO
3.0M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
11 matches · 2W–9L · seasons 2024–2025
Match history11 matches
L
2025-08-17 · GAC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracey Sica mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-05-18 · GAC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brooke Wagner mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-11 · GAC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Norford mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-04-27 · GAC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Sica mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-06 · GAC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Sica mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-09 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Sica mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-06-02 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Sica mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-26 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Sica mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-19 · GAC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Sica mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-05-05 · GAC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Sica mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-14 · GAC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Sica mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 34.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 82% of the time
#3 Doubles
82%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams