← Search

Nina Walzer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Atlanta, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 33W–22L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history55 matches
L
2026-07-12 · Sugar Creek (Monica Robinson)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ramsey Phillips
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-01 · Sugar Creek (Monica Robinson)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ramsey Phillips
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · Sugar Creek (Monica Robinson)* · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-14 · Sugar Creek (Monica Robinson)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Evelyn Richards
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · South Fulton (Tonya Blanks)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Asha Washington
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · Sugar Creek (Monica Robinson)* · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-05-31 · Sugar Creek (Monica Robinson)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittany Flanigan
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britiney Murphy championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Speight championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-10 · Tributary (Tanisha LeFever)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristi Smith
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-24 · Tributary (Tanisha LeFever)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Watts
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 6-2
L
2026-02-10 · Tributary (Tanisha LeFever)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Winston
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 72.1% of games
3.0
53.8%
14W–12L · 52% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 50.7% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.1% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
12 matches
#1 Singles
16%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer