← Search

James Telis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Leland, NC
2.5M year-end 2024
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
11 matches · 3W–8L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history11 matches
L
2024-07-13 · Johnston · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Deb Yackley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 0-6
W
2024-07-08 · Johnston · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Deb Yackley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-06-24 · Johnston · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lynda Johnston mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-22 · Johnston · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gayle Fulks mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-06-15 · Johnston · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Deb Yackley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-6
L
2019-05-07 · D'ALESIO · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth MacDonald
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2019-04-28 · D'ALESIO · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth MacDonald
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2019-04-23 · D'ALESIO · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gary Walters
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2019-03-28 · D'ALESIO · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth MacDonald
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2019-03-24 · D'ALESIO · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth MacDonald
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2019-03-17 · D'ALESIO · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Gross
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–6L · 12.2% of games
2.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
18%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer