← Search

Gayle Tanner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Folsom, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
265 matches · 164W–101L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history265 matches
W
2026-07-12 · BROADSTONE RC 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Schofield championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · BROADSTONE RC 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Schofield championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-10 · BROADSTONE RC 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Schofield championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · BROADSTONE RC 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Schofield championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · GOLD RIVER RC 18AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina Stoebe
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · BROADSTONE RC 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Schofield championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · GOLD RIVER RC 18AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina Stoebe
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-07 · BROADSTONE RC 18AW4.0B · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · BROADSTONE RC 18AW4.0B · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Blanford
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-25 · BROADSTONE RC 18AW4.0B · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-24 · BROADSTONE RC 18AW4.0B · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 68.8% of games
4.0
51.8%
59W–55L · 51.8% of games
4.5
40%
4W–6L · 43.8% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 68.2% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.5% of games
7.5
70%
14W–6L · 58.5% of games
8.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 56.7% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 52.4% of games
7.0mixed
73.5%
25W–9L · 64.2% of games
8.0mixed
60%
15W–10L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
56 matches
#2 Singles
6%
16 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal