← Search

Tracy Thomsic

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lynchburg, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 100W–90L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history190 matches
W
2026-10-29 · BCC - Thomsic/Cook - Court Queens · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sarah Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-28 · BCC - Thomsic/Cook - Court Queens · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Weijuan Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-28 · BCC - Thomsic/Cook - Court Queens · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Chidester
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-10-25 · BCC - Thomsic/Cook - Court Queens · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Sauls
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-24 · BCC - Terrell - Combo Crushers · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gretchen Perkins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-22 · BCC - Lusher - Net Prophets · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Lusher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-12 · BCC - Thomsic/Cook - Court Queens · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Chidester
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-12 · BCC - Terrell - Combo Crushers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Keller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-08 · BCC - Thomsic/Cook - Court Queens · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Chidester
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-01 · BCC - Thomsic/Cook - Court Queens · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Laura Hengerer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-30 · BCC - Terrell - Combo Crushers · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Keller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-09-24 · BCC - Thomsic/Cook - Court Queens · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Chidester
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
70%
7W–3L · 58.9% of games
3.0
44.2%
34W–43L · 48% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.8% of games
5.5
75%
6W–2L · 57.9% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
20W–12L · 56.6% of games
6.5mixed
56.2%
18W–14L · 52.8% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
43 matches
#1 Singles
7%
14 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe