← Search

Amit Srivastava

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Folsom, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
330 matches · 154W–176L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history330 matches
L
2026-09-28 · BROADSTONE RC CM7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Keith Purser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-08 · BROADSTONE RC CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paul Tsoi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · BROADSTONE RC 40MX8.0B · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Edling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · BROADSTONE RC 40MX8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paige Farrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-19 · BROADSTONE RC 40MX8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Edling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · BROADSTONE RC 40MX8.0B · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Edling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-03 · BROADSTONE RC 40MX8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paige Farrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · BROADSTONE RC 40MX8.0B · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Edling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · GOLD RIVER RC 18AM4.5B · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Ryan
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-24 · GOLD RIVER RC 18AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Hammonds
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · GOLD RIVER RC 18AM4.5B · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Pruett
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · GOLD RIVER RC 18AM4.5B · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Pruett
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 60.9% of games
3.5
71.4%
20W–8L · 57.9% of games
4.0
35.9%
23W–41L · 43.6% of games
4.5
12.5%
2W–14L · 34.7% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.4% of games
7.5
38.5%
10W–16L · 44.9% of games
8.5
0%
0W–6L · 24.2% of games
6.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
12.5%
4W–28L · 35.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually Singles, 29% of the time
Singles
29%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
72 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
53 matches
#1 Singles
6%
18 matches
#2 Singles
6%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe