← Search

Barbara Rayll

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 25W–86L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history111 matches
W
2026-10-29 · Coker-Woodson/LF/40&over3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janna Ryel
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-28 · Coker-Woodson/LF/40&over3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Chambers
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-21 · Coker-Woodson/LF/40&over3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-07 · Coker-Woodson/LF/40&over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamara McKillip
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-22 · Coker-Woodson/LF/40&over3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Watson
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-10 · Coker-Woodson/LF/40&over3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamara McKillip
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lyndsey Weber
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Darla Knight
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lyndsey Weber
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-13 · declined: Carr/LF/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-06 · declined: Carr/LF/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-14 · declined: Carr/LF/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.4% of games
3.0
20%
4W–16L · 37.8% of games
3.5
22.6%
14W–48L · 37.8% of games
4.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 46% of games
5.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 31.8% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 24% of the time
#3 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
17 matches
#1 Singles
14%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert