← Search

Stacy Goldberg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cleveland, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 124W–57L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history181 matches
W
2026-11-01 · C 7.5W CSC Goldberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin Ryan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-23 · C 6.5W CSC Schuele · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Curley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-11 · C 7.5W CSC Goldberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin Ryan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-09 · C 6.5W CSC Schuele · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Curley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-02 · CX 6.5 CSC Eyre · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Goldberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-25 · C 6.5W CSC Schuele · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tara Hata
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · C 7.5W CSC Goldberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blair Kurit
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · A40 3.5W CSC Ryan · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-20 · 55 7.0W E MV2 O'Shaughnessy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Schmitt
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · X18 7.0 2 CSC Langmack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brandon Farley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-17 · X18 7.0 2 CSC Langmack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clark Langmack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · A40 3.5W CSC Ryan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy MacLean
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 68% of games
3.5
82.6%
57W–12L · 60.9% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.2% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 58.3% of games
7.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 57% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.5% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 44.4% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
31 matches
#1 Singles
17%
30 matches
Singles
16%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe