Megan Archibald
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
HEBER CITY, UT
143 matches · 98W–45L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history143 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2025
Red Ledges-Christensen/Jones
Red Ledges-Christensen/Thomson
Red Ledges-Christensen/Thomson
Red Ledges-Archibald
Red Ledges-Archibald
Red Ledges-Archibald
Red Ledges-Archibald
Red Ledges-Archibald
Liberty Park Tennis-Miller/Miller
Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/Dagley
Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/Dagley
Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/Dagley
Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/Dagley
CMTA @ Liberty Park-Simmons/Despain
Cottonwood Club-Kieffer/Annunziata
CMTA @ Liberty Hills-Simmons/Simmons
CMTA @ Liberty Park-Simmons/Simmons
South Jordan-FinlayEgan
South Jordan-Simmons/Simmons
South Jordan-Simmons/Simmons
CMTA @ Liberty Park-Farnsworth
South Jordan-Farnsworth
South Jordan-Farnsworth/Sampson
South Jordan-Simmons/Simmons
South Jordan-Simmons/Simmons
CMTA @ Liberty Park-Criddle
CMTA @ Liberty Park-Criddle/Rhoads
South Jordan-Dean/Criddle
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
74.4%
29W–10L · 60.8% of games
3.5
64.2%
61W–34L · 55.9% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 69.9% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
37 matches
#1 Singles
24%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.