← Search

Becky Rivard

Kansas City, KS
3.0C year-end 2023
98 matches · 51W–47L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Becky sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Becky is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Becky has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Becky has gone from the 68th to the 50th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 76% of games
3.0
59.4%
19W–13L · 57.9% of games
3.5
32.1%
9W–19L · 41.5% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 46.3% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
L
2023-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Nelson
−0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Suni Chabrow / Susan Gray
2023-03-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Nelson
+0.017better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-03-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with RACQUEL DIZON
−0.011below expectation — took 43% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-5
W
2022-12-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonya Ladd
+0.020better than expected — took 58% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Michelle Castillo / Nancy Holland
2022-12-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Kiyono
−0.020below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Rachel Lamb / Lindsey Lanni
2022-11-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Eggleston
−0.012below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2022-10-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Baxter
+0.008about as expected — took 35% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Judith Milligan / Jennifer Hall
2022-10-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Baxter
+0.048better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-10-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with RACQUEL DIZON
−0.012below expectation — took 32% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Rachel Lamb / Rachael Sigsbee
2022-09-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with RACQUEL DIZON
−0.024below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Darija Velicchamps
2022-06-16 · #2 Singles
−0.059below expectation — took 25% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Mandy Willis
−0.017about as expected — took 59% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.