← Search

Mark Pollock

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Orleans, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 17W–25L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history42 matches
L
2025-06-23 · Fabre/18/3.0/MD/CP · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Kang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-06-16 · Fabre/18/3.0/MD/CP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Kang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-14 · Fabre/18/3.0/MD/CP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Toras mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-09 · Smith/40/3.0/NO/MCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roland Bonin
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-10 · Smith/40/3.0/NO/MCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Will Newman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-02-25 · Smith/40/3.0/NO/MCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roland Bonin
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-19 · Smith/40/3.0/NO/MCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-01-29 · Smith/40/3.0/NO/MCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Edward Halpern
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-29 · Hughs/40/3.0/MD/CP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Duncan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
2024-07-08 · Hughs/40/3.0/MD/CP · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexis Butler mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-10 · Hughs/40/3.0/MD/CP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Hughs mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-03-22 · Barner/40/3.0/NO/XU · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Edward Halpern
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.5% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 21.4% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 51.9% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#1 Singles
21%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#2 Singles
14%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer