← Search

Matt Edens

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
JONESBORO, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 9W–6L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history15 matches
L
2026-06-14 · Carr/Rogers/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Carpenter championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-12 · Carr/Rogers/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Carpenter championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-04 · Carr/Rogers/LR/Rebs · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Carpenter
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Default
2026-04-19 · Carr/Rogers/LR/Rebs · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Hill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-04-29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Carpenter
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sabina McDaniel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Hunter Roper mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-05-17 · ???/JB/??? · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brad Heringer
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-05-14 · ???/JB/??? · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brad Heringer
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-05-03 · ???/JB/??? · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brad Heringer
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2021-04-24 · Cato/JB/JCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Byron Cato
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.9% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 24.4% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#1 Singles
20%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams