← Search

Daniel Bartlett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, KY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
321 matches · 99W–222L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history321 matches
L
2026-11-01 · KY/LEX/Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Wilson
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-29 · KY/LEX/Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackson Brostulim
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-11 · KY/LEX/Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradley Selack
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-09 · KY/LEX/Begley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Parrett
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-30 · KY/LEX/Wilson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Hansel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-09-26 · KY/LEX/Wilson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mike Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-19 · KY/LEX/Wilson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ken Jensen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-17 · KY/LEX/Wilson/Lexington · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Hancock
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-30 · KY/LEX/Wilson/Lexington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dave Least
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-15 · KY/LEX/Wilson/Lexington · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dave Least
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-03 · KY/LEX/Wilson/Lexington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Deaton
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-27 · KY/LEX/Wilson/Lexington · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Hansel
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams88 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
26.9%
7W–19L · 41% of games
3.0
38.7%
58W–92L · 46.6% of games
3.5
18.6%
13W–57L · 37.5% of games
5.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.7% of games
6.5
23.1%
6W–20L · 34.1% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 25% of games
3.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 40.4% of games
5.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.1% of games
6.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
115 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
75 matches
#1 Singles
6%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
15 matches
#2 Singles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King