← Search

Seema Chugh

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Orlando, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 37W–74L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history111 matches
L
2026-02-25 · USTA Campus- Cogswell · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Sanders
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · USTA Campus- Cogswell · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Cogswell
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-12 · USTA Campus- Cogswell · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Sanders
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-02-10 · USTA Campus- Cogswell · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Sanders
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-02-03 · USTA Campus- Cogswell · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Sanders
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-20 · USTA Campus- Cogswell · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Sanders
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-09-12 · Orange/Naumenko · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Alexa McCulley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-08-10 · USTA Campus-Cogswell · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jody MacKenzie
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-07-22 · USTA Campus-Cogswell · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elly Phoebus
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-07-18 · Orange/Naumenko · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kiera Phoebus
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-04-15 · USTA Campus-Luter · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Harsh Chugh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-18 · ORANGE/Cogswell/55/6.0Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irina Jacobs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 52.2% of games
3.0
5.6%
2W–34L · 27.8% of games
5.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 46.1% of games
6.0
40%
4W–6L · 49.7% of games
6.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams