← Search

Karin Shelton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Folsom, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 108W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history173 matches
L
2026-10-29 · BROADSTONE RC CW6.5B · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ann Huntley-Garcia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-13 · BROADSTONE RC CW6.5B · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shizuka Wire
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-10-05 · BROADSTONE RC CW6.5B · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ann Huntley-Garcia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · BROADSTONE RC CW6.5B · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Ann Barnovitz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-05 · BROADSTONE RC CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teresa Jansson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · BROADSTONE RC CW6.5B · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shizuka Wire
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-30 · BROADSTONE RC CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Barbara van Fleet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-12 · BROADSTONE RC 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Reading-Foster championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-02 · BROADSTONE RC 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gloria Liu
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · BROADSTONE RC 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diem Le
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-06 · BROADSTONE RC 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thanh Nguyen
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-05 · BROADSTONE RC 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Snyder
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 70.4% of games
3.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 66% of games
3.5
60.3%
41W–27L · 54.3% of games
4.0
25%
4W–12L · 44% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 72% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 63.2% of games
6.5
63.3%
19W–11L · 56.2% of games
7.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 61% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 77.6% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
45 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert