← Search

Nancy Sicairos

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Leesburg, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
447 matches · 370W–77L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history447 matches
W
2026-09-21 · Green/Sicairos - Good Good Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Green
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-20 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brita Robinson championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-19 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nancy Scully championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nancy Scully championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Green championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-22 · ACOSTA - High Rollers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laith Peter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-08-04 · Green/Sicairos - Good Good Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shruti Srinivasan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · ACOSTA - High Rollers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · ACOSTA - High Rollers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-5
L
2026-06-07 · Team 2 The Ringers · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-3
L
2026-06-04 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hana Freymiller
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams109 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
2.5
87.5%
28W–4L · 71.5% of games
3.0
89.1%
82W–10L · 70.1% of games
3.5
87.3%
110W–16L · 68.8% of games
4.0
79.5%
35W–9L · 60% of games
4.5
52.2%
24W–22L · 53.5% of games
5.5
100%
10W–0L · 71.8% of games
6.5
96%
24W–1L · 68.5% of games
7.5
90.9%
20W–2L · 67.2% of games
8.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.6% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games
7.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 63.4% of games
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 55.2% of games
8.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 70.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
178 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
92 matches
#1 Singles
11%
48 matches
#2 Singles
3%
11 matches
#3 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer